The connectivity and access provided by the internet has fundamentally altered the world of news. Now any person with a Twitter account or a blog can comment on their own version of the news and place it where potentially millions of people can see it. This has created the era of the in-home news reporter.
Is this fundamental shift in news reporting a net positive or net negative? Opening the world up to new ideas and personal opinions can be a good thing. This gives the average person a chance to share their thoughts and ideas and promotes free-thinking. In certain situations, however, these in-home reporters could do more harm than good. Listening to commentary on trending news could open your mind up to new ideas, but it can also be hard to determine whether or not the facts of the story are true. http://postonmagazine.com/
Corroborating the facts listed in a blog or tweet can be difficult and most readers will not take the time to do so. This means that certain readers can accept the information provided by an in-home news reporter as facts, even if the information presented is actually false. This could lead to the spreading of false information and rumors. Another potential problem with these in-home reporters is where they source their information. It can be very hard to properly source information from the World Wide Web. Even if the in-home reporter does source their material, how does the reader really know if this source is accurate?
The in-home reporter can be a very powerful in today’s society, especially in the United States where free speech is so important. Providing commentary on top news stories keeps the free exchange of ideas going. It allows readers to hear different points of view that what they may not get from the top news sites. As long as the individual reader takes the time to consider all of the facts and make their own informed decision, the in-home news reporter can be a very powerful.